Comparing study of CuO synthesized by biological and electrochemical methods for biological activity

Authors

  • shaimaa hamed jaber Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Mustansiriyah University
  • Ahmed M. Rheima Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Wasit University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1072-1392
  • Dhia H. Hussain Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Mustansiriyah University
  • Mohammed F. Al-Marjani Department of Biology, College of Science, Mustansiriyah University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-2201

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23851/mjs.v30i1.389

Abstract

In the present work, copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles have been synthesized by two methods (electro chemical and biological method).The synthesized nanoparticles characterized by x-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy(SEM) and transmission Electron Microscopy(TEM). results show that to copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticle have average size of (11-15)nm of electrochemical method and (6-12 ) nm of biological method by different technique CuO nanoparticles were applied to study the inhibition of bacterial using (staphylococcus and pseudomonas). The antibacterial activity of CuO nanoparticles show a higher inhibition of pseudomonas bacteria when a compared with staphylococcus bacteria.

References

G. Shobha, M. Vinuthaand S. Ananda. (IJPSI). 2014, 3, 8:06-28-38.

D.V.Fernando, K.D. Gautom, A. Aamir, M.K. Ian and K.Dietmar. PLOS ONE. 2014, 9, 2:e88723.

M.S. Yeh, Y.S. Yang, Y.P. Lee, H.F. Lee, Y. Yeh, and C. Yeh. (JPC). 1999, 103, 33:6851-6857.

[Crossref]

Y.H. Kim, D.K. Lee, B.G. Jo, J.H. Jeong, and Y.S. Kang. Colloids and Surfaces A. 2006, 284-285:364-368.

[Crossref]

J. Hambrock, R. Becker, A. Birkner, J. Wei, and R.A. Fischer. Chemical Communications. 2002, 1:68-69.

[Crossref]

PMid:12120314

K.J. Ziegler, R.C. Doty, K.P. Johnston, and B.A. Korgel. (JACS). 2001, 123, 32:7797-7803.

[Crossref]

PMid:11493053

S.K. Haram, A.R. Mahadeshwar and S. G. Dixit. (JPC). 1996, 100, 14:5868-5873.

[Crossref]

I. Lisiecki, M. Björling, L. Motte, B. Ninham, and M. P. Pileni. Langmuir. 1995, 11, 7: 2385-2392.

[Crossref]

A.A. Ponce and K.J. Klabunde. (JMC).2005, 225, 1: 1-6.

[Crossref]

I. Haas, S. Shanmugam, and A. Gedanken. (JPC). 2006, 110, 34:16947-16952.

[Crossref]

PMid:16927986

E.K. Athanassiou, R.N. Grass, and W.J. Stark; Nanotechnology. 2006, 17, 6:1668-1673.

[Crossref]

PMid:26558576

L. Chen, D. Zhang, J. Chen, H. Zhou, and H. Wan, Materials Science and Engineering A. 2006, 415, 1-2: 156-161.

[Crossref]

A.A. Athawale, P.P. Katre, M. Kumar, and M.B. Majumdar. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2005, 91, 2-3:507-512.

[Crossref]

A. Ameer, S.A. Arham, O. Mohammad, S.K. Mohammad, S.H. Sami and M. Adnan. (IJN). 2012, 7: 6003-6009.

V. Vinod, P. Thekkae and C. Miroslav. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013, 8: 889-898.

K. Phiwdang, S. Suphankij, W. Mekprasart and W. Pecharapa. Energy Procedia. 2013, 34:740 - 745 .

[Crossref]

Y. Abboud, T. Saffaj, A. Chagraoui, A. El Bouari, K. Brouzi, O. Tanane and B. Ihssane. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 4:571-57.

[Crossref]

Downloads

Published

2019-08-15

How to Cite

[1]
shaimaa hamed jaber, A. M. Rheima, D. H. Hussain, and M. F. Al-Marjani, “Comparing study of CuO synthesized by biological and electrochemical methods for biological activity”, MJS, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 94–98, Aug. 2019.

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Chemical Science

License

The journal has no restrictions for the author to hold the copyrights of his articles. The journal does not allow authors to republish the same article in other journals or conferences that is published in one of its volumes.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC